REVIEW PAPER
Midwifery abdication – is it acknowledged or discussed within the midwifery literature: An integrative review
Elaine Jefford 1  
,  
Julie Jomeen 2
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Southern Cross University, Australia
2
University of Hull, Hull, UK
Publish date: 2018-06-27
Submission date: 2018-03-20
Final revision date: 2018-06-01
Acceptance date: 2018-06-22
 
Eur J Midwifery 2018;2(June):6
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
In this review we explore the concept of Midwifery Abdication and whether it is acknowledged or discussed within the midwifery literature.

Methods:
modified Whittemore and Knafl integrative review framework of 2005 enabled consideration of quantitative and qualitative literature. A total of 1508 papers were located. Duplicate records were removed, leaving 1197 records. All titles, abstracts, or case facts were reviewed using a framework derived from the definition of Midwifery Abdication. Three qualitative studies were selected for analysis; the NICE Quality Appraisal Checklist was used to determine study quality.

Results:
Midwifery Abdication occurs, as reported within the wider midwifery literature, and indicated in three studies from different countries. However, the original constructs need to be widened to include: ‘external perceptions of midwifery practice’ and ‘how can reflection facilitate change’. The extent of philosophy in these environments leads to the adoption of midwifery philosophy failure. Such an environment impacts on a midwife’s ability to fully exercise autonomy, and to advocate for normality and women. This renders Midwifery Abdication almost inevitable or at least very difficult to prevent. A midwife’s professional identity, environmental hierarchy and associated culture of social obedience, acceptance and finding one’s place, all act as influencing factors in abdication.

Conclusions:
Midwifery education needs to ensure that midwives are prepared and able to embrace their professional status as independent practitioners. Promotion of reflexive practice to facilitate personal and professional change is warranted. Practice policies that are not supportive of a midwife’s professional autonomy and scope of practice reinforce the technocratic work environment.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Elaine Jefford   
Southern Cross University, Education Campus, Hogbin Drive, 2450 Coffs Harbour, Australia
 
REFERENCES (37):
1. International Confederation of Midwives. International code of ethics for midwives. https://internationalmidwives..... Published 2008. Updated 2014. Accessed February 2018.
2. International Confederation of Midwives. Professional accountability of the midwife. http://internationalmidwives.o.... Published 2008. Updated 2014. Accessed January 2018.
3. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Code of professional conduct for midwives in Australia. http://www.nursingmidwiferyboa.... Published 2008.
4. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Code of ethics for midwives in Australia. Canberra: Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia; 2008.
5. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Midwives rules and standards. London Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2012.
6. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Safety and quality guidelines for privately practising midwives attending homebirths. http://www.nursingmidwiferyboa.... Published 2017. Accessed July 2017.
7. Elaine Jefford, Julie Jomeen. “Midwifery Abdication”: A finding from an interpretive study. International Journal of Childbirth. 2015;5(3):116-125. doi:10.1891/2156-5287.5.3.116.
8. Elaine Jefford. Optimal midwifery decision-making during 2nd stage labour: The integration of clinical reasoning into practice [PhD Thesis]. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University; 2012.
9. Henri Tajfel, John Turner. An integrative theory on inter-group conflict. In: WG Austin, S Worchel, eds. The Social Psychology of Inter-Group Relations. Belmount: Wadsworth; 1979:33-47.
10. International Confederation of Midwives. International definition of the midwife. http://internationalmidwives.o.... Published 2011. Updated 2017. Accessed September 2015.
11. Australian College of Midwives. National midwifery guidelines for consultation and referral. https://www.midwives.org.au/po.... Published 2015. Updated2017. Accessed August 2016.
12. Carole England, Ransolina Morgan. Communication skills for midwives: Challenges in everyday practice. London: McGraw Hill; 2012.
13. J Mei, Y Afshar, K Gregory, S Kilpatrick, T Esakoff. Birth plans: What matters for birth experience satisfaction. Birth Issues in Perinatal Care. 2016;43(2):144-151. doi:doi:10.1111/birt.12226.
14. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. National competency standards for the midwife. http://www.nursingmidwiferyboa.... Published 2006. Updated 2010. Accessed January 2018.
15. B. Hunter. The importance of reciprocity in relationships between community-based midwives and mothers. Midwifery. 2006; 22(4):308-322.
16. Robin Whittemore, Kathleen Knafl. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2005;52(5):546-553. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
17. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
18. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance - Appendix H: Quality appraisal checklist – qualitative studies. https://www.nice.org.uk/proces.... Published 2012. Accessed February 2017.
19. Eleni Hadjigeorgiou, Kirstie Coxon. In Cyprus, ‘midwifery is dying…’. A qualitative exploration of midwives' perceptions of their role as advocates for normal childbirth. Midwifery. 2014;30(9):983-990. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2013.08.009.
20. Hannah Rice, Jane Warland. Bearing witness: Midwives experiences of witnessing traumatic birth. Midwifery. 2013;29(9):1056-1063. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.003.
21. A. Lyndon. Social and environmental conditions creating fluctuating agency for safety in two urban academic birth centers. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, And Neonatal Nursing:. 2008;37(1):13-23. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00204.x.
22. R. Baumeister. Need-to-belong theory. In: PAM Van Lange, AW Kruglanski, ET Higgins, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Vol 2. London: Sage; 2011:121-140.
23. Caroline J. Hollins Martin, Peter Bull. Measuring social influence of a senior midwife on decision-making in maternity care: An experimental study. Community Applied Social Psychology. 2005;15(2):120-126. doi:10.1002/casp.808.
24. C Hollins Martin, P Bull. What features of the maternity unit promote obedient behaviour from midwives. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 2006;9(Supplement 2):e221-231. doi:10.1016/j.cein.2006.05.002.
25. Australian College of Midwives. Philosophy statement for midwifery. http://www.midwives.org.au/. Published 2017. Accessed November 2017.
26. International Confederation of Midwives. Keeping birth normal. http://www.internationalmidwiv.... Published 2008. Accessed February 2010.
27. Robbie Davis-Floyd. The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science & Medicine. 1994;38(8):1125-1140.
28. Robbie Davis- Floyd. The technocratic model: Past and present. In: R Davis- Floyd, ed. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 2004:44-72.
29. K. Fahy, M. Foureur, C. Hastie. Birth territory and midwifery guardianship: Theory for practice, education and research. Sydney: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008.
30. S. Pairman. Midwifery partnership: A professionalizing strategy for midwives. In: M Kirkham, ed. The Midwife-Mother Relationship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010:208-231.
31. S Miller, L Wilkes. Working in Partnership. In: S Pairman, J Pincombe, C Thorogood, S Tracy, eds. Midwifery: Preparation for Practice. 3 ed. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone -Elsevier; 2014:412-427.
32. S Pairman, J McAra-Couper. Theorectical frameworks for midwifery practice. In: S Pairman, J Pincombe, C Thorogood, M Tracy, eds. Midwifery: Preparation for Practice. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2014:383-3782.
33. N. Leap, S. Pairman. Working in partnership. In: S Pairman, J Pincombe, C Thorogood, S Tracy, eds. Midwifery: Preparation for practice. Australia: Elsevier; 2006:258-270.
34. International Confederation of Midwives. Essential competencies for basic midwifery practice. https://internationalmidwives..... Published 2010. Updated2013. Accessed September 2013.
35. International Confederation of Midwives. Global standards for midwifery regulation. https://internationalmidwives..... Published 2011. Updated2013. Accessed March 2017.
36. World Health Organisation. WHO Europe midwifery curriculum for qualified nurses: WHO European strategy for continuing education for nurses and midwives. http://alraziuni.edu.ye/book1/.... Published 2003. Accessed August 2015.
37. Megan-Jane Johnstone. Bioethics: A nursing perspective. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier; 2016.
eISSN:2585-2906