Home
Issues
Aim & Scope
Open Access
Editorial Board
Indexing
Supporting Midwifery Associations
Contact us
Manuscript Types
Manuscript Formatting
How to submit
Special publications and Reprints
Authorship & COI
Principles of Transparency Checklist
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Student midwives’ exposure to physiological birth practices: A cross-sectional study of 3055 births during 2020-23 in England
1
King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, London, United Kingdom
Eur J Midwifery 2026;10(Supplement 1):A748
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Among a range of care episodes and proficiencies UK midwifery students must complete to qualify, they need to personally facilitate 40 births. Students’ experiences of midwifery-led birth practices are dependent on their exposure within the clinical environment; however, such variation has not yet been explored.
OBJECTIVES:
The aim of this study was to analyse, describe and compare the characteristics of the 40 births personally facilitated by one cohort of 77 students within one English inner-city university placed in nine NHS organisations.
METHODS:
Routinely collected data were extracted from 77 undergraduate student midwifery documents relating to births from 2020-2023. 3055 births were included. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
RESULTS:
Most births occurred in Obstetric Unit (OU) settings (71%), 27% in alongside midwifery-led units and only 1% were homebirths. Most care was provided to birthing women/people who were multiparous at term gestation, who used at least one form of pharmacological analgesia. Most births were facilitated in either semi recumbent (45.6%) or lithotomy birth positions (24%) with the OU setting accounting for 91% of these. Some birthing pool use for labour and/or birth were documented where the majority occurred in Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) settings. Comparisons between each student demonstrated wide variations of exposure to midwifery-led care practices.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings highlighted that the students had extensive experience within OU settings and medicalised care practices but less consistent exposure to midwifery-led practices. Without exposure to midwifery-led birth practices across all settings, students qualify without the necessary experience to build their competency to optimise physiological birth processes, raising concerns for their preceptor period and beyond.
KEY MESSAGE:
This is the first study to explore birth characteristics from the midwifery student perspective and reveal important concerns regarding maternity care provision in England with implications for the future workforce. Poster session 3 (Group B)
Among a range of care episodes and proficiencies UK midwifery students must complete to qualify, they need to personally facilitate 40 births. Students’ experiences of midwifery-led birth practices are dependent on their exposure within the clinical environment; however, such variation has not yet been explored.
OBJECTIVES:
The aim of this study was to analyse, describe and compare the characteristics of the 40 births personally facilitated by one cohort of 77 students within one English inner-city university placed in nine NHS organisations.
METHODS:
Routinely collected data were extracted from 77 undergraduate student midwifery documents relating to births from 2020-2023. 3055 births were included. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
RESULTS:
Most births occurred in Obstetric Unit (OU) settings (71%), 27% in alongside midwifery-led units and only 1% were homebirths. Most care was provided to birthing women/people who were multiparous at term gestation, who used at least one form of pharmacological analgesia. Most births were facilitated in either semi recumbent (45.6%) or lithotomy birth positions (24%) with the OU setting accounting for 91% of these. Some birthing pool use for labour and/or birth were documented where the majority occurred in Alongside Midwifery Unit (AMU) settings. Comparisons between each student demonstrated wide variations of exposure to midwifery-led care practices.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings highlighted that the students had extensive experience within OU settings and medicalised care practices but less consistent exposure to midwifery-led practices. Without exposure to midwifery-led birth practices across all settings, students qualify without the necessary experience to build their competency to optimise physiological birth processes, raising concerns for their preceptor period and beyond.
KEY MESSAGE:
This is the first study to explore birth characteristics from the midwifery student perspective and reveal important concerns regarding maternity care provision in England with implications for the future workforce. Poster session 3 (Group B)
| eISSN: | 2585-2906 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
