RESEARCH PAPER
Professional issues in maternal mental health scale (PIMMHS): The development and initial validation of a brief and valid measure
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
2
Independent researcher
3
Faculty of Society and Health, Buckinghamshire New University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Publish date: 2018-02-05
Submission date: 2017-11-20
Acceptance date: 2018-01-17
 
Eur J Midwifery 2018;2(February):2
KEYWORDS:
TOPICS:
ABSTRACT:
Introduction:
The life-threatening consequences of perinatal mental health problems (PMHP) are well documented. Midwives are ideally placed to effectively identify women at risk and facilitate early intervention. However, a multitude of factors contribute to failure in recognition and treatment. It would be of value for service providers to be able to identify key professional issues in their own context. The present study sought to develop and evaluate a ‘professional issues in maternal mental health’ scale (PIMMHS), explore its psychometric properties and potential application.

Methods:
A cross-sectional design and instrument evaluation approach was taken to investigate the psychometric properties of the PIMMHS. A total of 266 student midwives from 10 UK institutions completed the PIMMHS via Survey Monkey.

Results:
PIMMHS comprises two sub-scales of emotion/communication (PIMMHSEmotion sub-scale) and training (PIMMHS-Training sub-scale). Both PIMMHS subscales demonstrate adequate divergent and convergent validity. Sub-optimal internal consistency was observed for the training sub-scale, however, the PIMMHS-Training had a more impressive effect size in terms of known-groups discriminant validity compared to PIMMHS-Emotion.

Conclusions:
The PIMMHS appears to be a sound psychometric instrument for assessing professional issues that influence the practice of student midwives in PMH. The PIMMHS could support education providers to identify areas for curriculum development, as well as maternity services in proactive assessment of service provision, to identify training and service development opportunities.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Julie Jomeen   
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK, Dearne 002, Faculty of Health Sciences, Univeristy of Hull, HU6 7RX Hull, United Kingdom
 
REFERENCES (45):
1. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Why mothers die (2000–2002). London, RCOG, 2004.
2. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health. Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer (2003–2005). London, RCOG. 2007.
3. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries. Saving Mothers’ Lives: reviewing maternal deaths 2006–2008. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011; 118 (Suppl. 1):1-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x
4. Noonan M, Doody O, Jomeen J, Galvin R. Midwives’ perceptions and experiences of caring for women who experience perinatal mental health problems: An integrative review. Midwifery. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.010.
5. Darwin Z, McGowan L, Edozien LC. Antenatal mental health referrals: Review of local clinical practice and pregnant women's experiences in England. Midwifery 2015; 31(3):e17-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.11.004
6. Sockol, L. E., Epperson, C. N., Barber, J. P. Preventing postpartum depression: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 33, 2013; 1205-1217. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.004
7. Milgrom, J., Gemmill, A. W., Bilszta, J. L., Hayes, B., Barnett, B., Brooks, J., Ericksen, J., Ellwood, D., Buist, A. Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: A large prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2008; 108:147-157. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.014
8. Jarrett, P. How do women’s self-report symptoms impact on identification of perinatal mental health problems? Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice. 2017. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com.ezproxy.mdx.ac.uk/toc/jmhtep/12/3 (Accessed May 2017).
9. Jarrett, P. Pregnant womens’ experience of depression care. Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice. 2016, 11 (1), 33-47. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/full/10.1108/JMHTEP-05-2015-0023 (Accessed May 2017).
10. Priest, S. R., Austin, M. P., Barnett, B. B., Buist, A. A psychosocial risk assessment model (PRAM) for use with pregnant and postpartum women in primary care settings. Archives of Women's Mental Health. 2008;11:307-317.doi:10.1007/s00737-008-0028-3
11. Redshaw M., Henderson J. Who is actually asked about their mental health in pregnancy and the postnatal period? Findings from a national survey. BMC Psychiatry. 16(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1029-9
12. Edge, D. Falling through the net - Black and minority ethnic women and perinatal mental healthcare: health professionals' views. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2010;32:17-25. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.07.007
13. Mivsek, A. P., Hundley, V., Kiger, A. Slovenian midwives and nurses' views on post-natal depression: an exploratory study. International Nursing Review. 2008;55(3):320-326. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00620.x
14. McCauley, K., Elsom, S., Muir-Cochrane, E., Lyneham, J. Midwives and assessment of perinatal mental health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2011;18(9):786-795.
15. Hauck, Y. L., Kelly, G., Dragovic, M., Butt, J., Whittaker, P., Badcock, J. C. Australian midwives knowledge, attitude and perceived learning needs around perinatal mental health. Midwifery. 2015;31(1):247-255. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.002
16. Gibb, S., Hundley, V. What psychosocial well-being in the postnatal period means to midwives. Midwifery. 2007;23(3):413-424. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2006.07.005
17. Jones, C. J., Creedy, D. K., Gamble, J. A. Australian midwives attitudes towards care for women with emotional distress. Midwifery. 2012a;28(2):216-221. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2010.12.008
18. Jones, C. J., Creedy, D. K., Gamble, J. A. Australian midwives awareness and management of antenatal and postpartum depression. Women and Birth. 2012b;25(1):23-28. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2011.03.001
19. Ross-Davie, M., Elliott, S., Sarkar, A., Green, L. A public health role in perinatal mental health: Are midwives ready? British Journal of Midwifery. 2006;14(6):330-334. doi:10.12968/bjom.2006.14.6.21181
20. Rothera, I., Oates, M. Managing perinatal mental health: A survey of practitioners' views. British Journal of Midwifery, 2011;19(5):304-313. doi:10.12968/bjom.2011.19.5.304
21. Khan L (2015). Falling through the gaps: Perinatal mental health and general practice. London: Centre for mental Health.
22. Kline, P. A Psychometrics Primer. 2000. London: Free Association Books.
23. Martin, C. R., Fleming, M. P., & McCorkindale, S. Measurement properties of the Illness Perception Questionnaire in practitioners working with patients with co-morbid schizophrenia and learning disability. European Journal of Person Centered Healthcare. 2016; 4(1):doi:10.5750/ejpch.v4i1.1073.
24. Martin, C. R., & Savage-McGlynn, E. A ‘good practice’ guide for the reporting of design and analysis for psychometric evaluation. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 2013;31(5):449-455. doi:10.1080/02646838.2013.835036.
25. Elliott, S., Ross-Davie, M., Sarkar A., Green L. Detection and initial assessment of mental disorder: the midwife's role. British Journal of Midwifery. 2007;15(12)759-764. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2007.15.12.27791
26. Wallston, K. A., Stein, M. J., & Smith, C. A. Form C of the MHLC scales: a condition-specific measure of locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1994;63(3):534-553. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_10.
27. Jomeen, J. and Martin, C.R. A psychometric evaluation of Form C of the Multi-Dimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC-C) scale during early pregnancy. Psychology, Health and Medicine. 2005;10(2):202-214. doi:10.1080/13548500512331315434
28. Martin, C.R. Jomeen, J., Jarrett, P. The Development and Initial Validation of the Perinatal Mental Health Awareness Scale in Student Midwives. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health. 2017; 5(4):1-11. doi: 10.22038/JMRH.2017.9251.
29. Costello, A. B., Osborne, J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation. 2005;10(7).
30. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
31. Mahalanobis, P. C. On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India. 1936;2(1):49-55.
32. De Maesschalck, R., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., & Massart, D. L. The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2000;50(1):1-18. doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(99)00047-7
33. Horn, J. L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;309(2):179-185. doi:10.1007/bf02289447
34. Velicer, W. Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika. 1976;41(3):321-327. doi:10.1007/bf02293557
35. Bentler, P. M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-246. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
36. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the evaluation of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88:588-606.
37. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
38. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modelling (3rd ed.). 2010. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
39. Byrne, B. M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming (2nd ed.). 2010. New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
40. Kline, P. The Handbook of Psychological Testing. 1993. London: Routledge.
41. Tavakol, M., Dennick, R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2011;2:53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
42. Jarrett, P. Student midwives’ knowledge of perinatal mental health. British Journal of Midwifery. 2015;23(1):32-39. doi:10.12968/bjom.2015.23.1.32
43. Higgins, A., Carroll, M., & Sharek, D. Impact of perinatal mental health education on student midwives' knowledge, skills and attitudes: A pre/post evaluation of a module of study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;36:364-369. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.09.007.
44. Jomeen, J. Glover, L. and Davies S. Midwives’ Illness Perceptions of Antenatal Depression. British Journal of Midwifery. 2009;17(5): 296-303. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2009.17.5.42221
45. Hunter, B., Warren, L. Midwives׳ experiences of workplace resilience. Midwifery. 2014;30(8):926-934. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.010
eISSN:2585-2906