CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
Management of abnormal findings in Pap test results of women vaccinated with the cervical cancer vaccine
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Midwifery, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Publication date: 2025-10-24
Corresponding author
Giannoula Kyrkou
Department of Midwifery, School of Health and Care Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
Eur J Midwifery 2025;9(Supplement 1):A74
ABSTRACT
Overview:
Cervical cancer, historically prevalent in women, has witnessed a decline in incidence and
mortality rates with the introduction of Pap tests and screening programs. Human
Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, a primary preventive measure, offers further promise in
reducing the burden of cervical cancer. However, global variations in screening and
vaccination coverage persist, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the
effectiveness of these preventive measures. This study aims to compare cervical cytology
findings between vaccinated and unvaccinated women, addressing critical research
questions related to age, vaccination barriers, infections, and cancer staging.
Aims and Objectives:
This study aims to assess and compare cervical cytology findings, including cytology and
colposcopy, among vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Specific research questions
explore the impact of age on cervical cancer screening awareness, the correlation between
infections and cervical cancer risk, and factors contributing to the stage of cervical cancer at
diagnosis.
Method:
Data for this study were obtained from medical records and cervical cytology findings of 98
women collected from a gynecology clinic. The sample included both vaccinated and
unvaccinated individuals, and the analysis employed statistical tools within the SPSS
software. Variables such as age, vaccination status, time since vaccination, further testing,
other infections, and the stage of cervical cancer at diagnosis were examined.
Results:
The study revealed a concentration of individuals in the 15-35 age group, with 49% of the
sample over the age of 35. Vaccination coverage was encouraging, with 65.3% having
received the vaccine. However, 34.7% remained unvaccinated, indicating potential gaps in
awareness. Further analysis highlighted a significant proportion (40.8%) diagnosed with stage 1 cervical cancer, reinforcing the importance of regular screening. Vaccinated individuals were more likely to undergo further testing, suggesting a proactive health approach.
Conclusion:
The research underscores the effectiveness of vaccination and regular cervical cancer
screening in reducing the risk of cancer progression. While encouraging vaccination rates
were observed, the study identifies areas for improvement, including increased education
and awareness. The correlation between vaccination and the stage of cervical cancer
emphasizes the importance of proactive preventive measures. Overall, the findings
contribute valuable insights for informing and enhancing cervical cancer prevention and
screening strategies, particularly in regions with varying healthcare infrastructure and
awareness levels.