RESEARCH PAPER
Exploring subjective wellbeing after birth: A qualitative deductive descriptive study
Fiona Alderdice 1  
,  
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
2
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Fiona Alderdice   

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
Publish date: 2019-03-15
Submission date: 2018-11-14
Final revision date: 2019-02-11
Acceptance date: 2019-02-25
 
Eur J Midwifery 2019;3(March):5
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Subjective wellbeing is made up of cognitive (life satisfaction and positive functioning) and emotional (positive and negative affect) components. The subjective wellbeing of women in the perinatal period is poorly understood compared to that experienced by the general population. The aim of this paper is to describe women’s experiences of subjective wellbeing postpartum using the European Social Survey Wellbeing module to facilitate discussion.

Methods:
Nineteen women aged 18−40 years who had given birth within the past 6 months participated in two focus groups (n=9 and n=10). Participants in the focus groups were invited to complete the European Social Survey Wellbeing module and this was used as the basis for discussion.

Results:
Women recognized that many aspects of their wellbeing were compromised after having a baby, e.g. vitality and positive functioning. Women reported that the time after birth was often challenging in terms of feeling good about themselves. Women were often tired and did not always trust their own abilities as a parent. Woman reported feeling socially isolated after giving birth and highlighted the importance of their relationships in terms of feeling valued. Changes in relationships were a source of stress and conflict. Many women reported that they did not feel engaged with their local community.

Conclusions:
Women perceive their subjective wellbeing to be different after birth. A better understanding of the aspects of wellbeing that may be challenged after birth could facilitate provision of tailored support for women and their family to maximize their continued good health and wellbeing.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank all the women who took part in the focus groups and SureStart for facilitating them.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
Funding was from the British Academy (Small grant: 10.13039/501100000286).
PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
World Health Organisation. Measurement of and target-setting for well-being: an initiative by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office Europe; 2012. http://www.euro.who.int/__data.... Accessed April, 2018.
 
2.
Michaelson J, Abdallah S, Steuer N, Thompson S, et al. National Accounts of Wellbeing: bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet 2009. London, UK: NEF; 2009. http://roar.uel.ac.uk/603/1/Mi.... Accessed November 14, 2018.
 
3.
Deiner E, Chan MY. Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Wellbeing Contributes to Health and Longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Wellbeing. 2011;3(1)1-43. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
 
4.
Department of Health. Wellbeing across the lifecourse: The relationship between wellbeing and health. London, UK: Department of Health; 2014. https://assets.publishing.serv.... Accessed April, 2018.
 
5.
Jomeen J. The importance of assessing psychological status during pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period as a multidimensional construct: A literature review. Clin Eff Nurs. 2004;8(3-4):143-155. doi:10.1016/j.cein.2005.02.001
 
6.
Royal College of Midwives. Maternal Emotional Wellbeing and Infant Development: A Good Practice Guide for Midwives. London, UK: The Royal College of Midwives Trust; 2012. https://www.rcm.org.uk/sites/d.... Accessed February, 2019.
 
7.
Myrskylä M, Margolis R. Happiness: before and after the kids. Demography. 2014;51(5):1843-1866. doi:10.1007/s13524-014-0321-x
 
8.
Aassve A, Goisis A, Sironi M. Happiness and Childbearing Across Europe. Soc Indic Res. 2012;108(1):65-86. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9866-x
 
9.
Alderdice F, McNeill J, Gargan P, Perra O. Preliminary evaluation of the Wellbeing in Pregnancy (WiP) Questionnaire. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38(2):133-142. doi:10.1080/0167482x.2017.1285898
 
10.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal and postnatal mental health guidelines. Clinical Guidelines CG192. UK: NICE; 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidan.... Accessed November 14, 2018.
 
11.
Paulson JF, Bazemore SD. Prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers and its association with maternal depression: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010;303(19):1961-1969. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.605
 
12.
Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In: Diener E. Assessing Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 39. Springer; 2009:101-117. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5
 
13.
Bech P. Measuring the dimension of psychological general wellbeing by the WHO-5. Qual Life Newslett. 2004;32:15-16.
 
14.
Huppert FA, Marks N, Clark A, et al. Measuring wellbeing across Europe: Description of the ESS Wellbeing Module and preliminary findings. Soc Indic Res. 2009;91(3):301-315. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9346-0
 
15.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
 
16.
Morse JM, Field PA. Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. California, US: Sage Publications; 1995.
 
17.
Aasheim V, Waldenström U, Rasmussen S, Espehaug B, Schytt E. Satisfaction with life during pregnancy and early motherhood in first-time mothers of advanced age: a population-based longitudinal study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):86. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-86
 
18.
Gebuza G, Kazmierczak M, Mieczkowska E, Gierszewska M, Kotzbach R. Life Satisfaction and social support received by women in the perinatal period. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014;23(4):611-619. doi:10.17219/acem/37239
 
19.
Dyrdal GM, Roysamb E, Bang Nes R, Vitterso J. Can a happy relationship predict a happy life? A population-based study of maternal well-being during the life transiton of pregnancy, infancy and toddlerhood. J of Happiness Stud. 2011;12(6):947-962. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9238-2
 
20.
Kroll C. Different things make different people happy: examining social capital and subjective wellbeing by gender and parental status. Soc Indic Res. 2011;104(1):157-177. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9733-1
 
21.
Pinquat M, Sorensen S. Gender differences in self-concept and psychological wellbeing in old age: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(4):P195-P213. doi:10.1093/geronb/56.4.p195
 
22.
Mistry R, Stevens GD, Sareen H, De Vogli R, Halfon N. Parenting Related Stressors and Self-Reported Mental health of Mothers with Young Children. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1261-1268. doi:10.2105/ajph.2006.088161
 
23.
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;27(5):63. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
 
eISSN:2585-2906